According to the World Health Organization (WHO) in its World Cancer Report 2020, the incidence of cancer will increase by 50%. third of these cancers can be prevented, and only one third can be cured!
Since President Nixon before, "declared" war on cancer in 1971, the establishment of Cancer "fight" a losing battle against cancer. As the WHO report said, only one third of cancer todayhealed. government spent more than $ 2 billion a year trying to find cancer 'elusive Magic Bullet "So the cure. The extreme no cure in sight! U.S. On the other hand, allocates less than 5% of the budget - which is say less than $ 50 million for research on preventive measures, according to WHO, one third of cancers can be prevented. - but because they are not interested persons to learn and know more about prevention course was Somebody Up There? the their priorities mixed -It is understandable that for good reason - to protect vested interests.
Rachel Carson wrote in Silent Spring, "For the first time in world history, every human being is now subjected to contact with dangerous chemicals, from the moment of conception until death ... We live in a sea of carcinogenic substances." Zillah Eisenstein, professor of politics in his book: breast cancer, fact-wrote, was born with no breasts. Cancer One Man "is on. IT grows... Time breast tissue is more vulnerable to damage from carcinogens, pesticides, radiation, biopsy needles, etc. Quoting Sharon Thomson, wrote, "that is happening to our planet that happens to our breasts. What "Studies show that the blood of patients with breast contains 35% more of DDE (a metabolite of DDT) than that of healthy women."
If it takes billions and billions of dollars to treat only 33% of tumors, what is necessary to prevent 33% ofcancer? Dirt Cheap by comparison! The New Straits Times, 16 December 2006, carried a report by Donald Berry of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, said: "% Breast cancer rates fell an unprecedented seven in 2003, the year after millions of women have stopped taking menopause hormones. "NON HRT / ERT pills and does not cost money doing just that breast cancer decreased by 7%.
After spending billions of dollars trying tocreate new chemotherapy drugs, this is what experts say about the benefits of chemotherapy to treat cancer. Doctors in Australia, Graeme Morgan, Robyn Ward and Michael Baton wrote that in Australia, of the 10,661 people who have had breast cancer and undergoing chemotherapy, only 164 people survived 5 years. This represents 1.5% of the contribution of chemotherapy to survival at five years. This is a classic case of a lot of money chasing elusiveresults!
Take another look at the numbers. Do not think about prevention - it is simply not taking ERT / HRT is much cheaper and safer to get chemotherapy for first and go after that?
But because people are not interested in prevention? As I have said many times, prevention is not money. It does not support the industry. Rather, it hurts all types of industries. Take, for example, if a drop in cancer rates, there would be fewer hospitalsto build (the parties are not happy!), we do not need oncologists, radiation machines use less, there would be less need for chemotherapy, less than X-ray film, and even there would be fewer tourists to the country in search of medical care (including the tourism industry is concerned!). Prevention is not only about the medical-pharmaceutical industry, also hurt the many industries that manufacture chemicals and by-products that pollute PlanetEarth.
What can we do? The key is education - the dissemination of fair, unbiased knowledge for all. We have a choice of flow with the flow and the sick, or take responsibility for our health and say no to something that pollute our bodies and our environment. Learn for ourselves and take preventive measures.
Recommend : Smile Dentistry
No comments:
Post a Comment