Breast Cancer - radiation-induced metastasis and Agony - Part 3

The wife of a friend of mine was diagnosed with breast cancer nine years ago. She underwent a mastectomy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. 'Was good after that. It was a pride of doctors and has been invited to the festival "Celebration of Life." But not to be. Shortly after receiving a call that does not feel good. His arm swelled up and the doctor said this would be due to the effect of radiotherapy has nine years ago. In November 2002, wasthe hospital with the diagnosis of brain metastasis. She underwent radiotherapy. After the tenth treatment, developed a severe lung infection and his white blood cells dramatically reduced. Further irradiation (twenty sessions more) have been abandoned. She was immobilized in the hospital for more than two months. Then he developed cystitis. She was discharged from the hospital in late January 2003. In mid-March 2003, he died with blood on stooland his blood pressure decreased (internal bleeding?). On 17 March 2003, my friend called to tell me that his wife died in the afternoon.

My experience in cancer research has shown that death and suffering are not following the sudden appearance of a small tumor in the brain. Then, what about the blood in the stool? This could be one of the effects of radiation? I once said: "In more serious cases of cancer, even doing nothing is better than the so-calledscientifically proven heroic path. "

Tales from England

The Daily Mail of 31 March 1995 carried an article titled "Cancer Deception" by Paul Eastham.
Four members of angry RAGE (Radiotherapy Action Group Exposure) told members of Parliament's Health Select Committee that "thousands of cancer victims have been" crazy "to any unnecessary radiation, which left them crippled and in agony." They said that doctors had assured them that the radiation wasonly needed as a precaution after "their breast surgery and failing to warn that their bones can collapse and you could lose the use of limbs."

RAGE was founded by Lady Ironside who suffered paralysis of the arm after surgery and radiotherapy because of breast cancer. His leg was fragile after radiotherapy and suffered multiple fractures to an injured arm, collarbone and four ribs.

Lady Ironside, said: "The radiographershave not been honest with me. All of us in anger was told that there would be no significant side effects. We would probably suffer from temporary nausea and exhaustion, but no permanent damage ... Maybe I was overconfident and foolish. Now I suffer extreme pain and paralysis. Had I been properly informed about the dangers, I walked away and said, "No thanks" and took my chances. "

Later, Lady Ironside found that almost one in five breast cancer patients irradiatedin a London hospital has suffered serious injuries that could get worse.

Lady Ironside suffering is not an isolated case of side effects of radiation. Many others also suffer as they did. RAGE represents 1,000 victims and breast irradiation is in contact with more than 2,000.

The former art historian Lorna Patch, 72, was forced to retire after his right arm was paralyzed after radiotherapy. He said: "I've never been warned about the risks they are.constant pain. The condition is irreversible and progressive. "

January Millinglon is a director of 55 years. She was diagnosed with breast cancer in 1982. He had a lump removed and underwent radiation therapy. January Millinglon argues that the leaflets at the time of hospital treatment to explain the side effects were of short duration. His right arm is paralyzed as a result of radiotherapy.

Friends Link : Nail Vitamins Omega 3 Store. LOWER Prices in The Same Item

Herbal and alternative treatments for breast cancer

Herbal remedies have been used for thousands of years. Now, faced with breast cancer with chemotherapy and radiation are women who complete this traditional and alternative medicine, herbal treatments. They are not abandoning the usual treatment of breast cancer, who are using alternative treatments and herbal to reduce the side effects.

Ginseng has been used by the Chinese for centuries. They believe that stimulatesthe immune system and the energies of the patient. There are more than 30 active compounds in ginseng root. Many of the compounds is considered that the anti-cancer properties. In a Chinese study found that women who took ginseng before diagnosis of a higher survival rate than women who took ginseng after their diagnosis was. The women reported having a better quality of life and suffer less depression while using ginseng.

There is a fungus that helps Maitakestimulating the immune system. Again, East is widely used. Laboratory studies were conducted using Maitake extract liquid. Many researchers consider that the fungal beta-glucan, which helps improve the immune system contain. I still do not know why, but it is working.

Mistletoe extract has been used in Europe for the treatment of cancer patients over 80 years. It 'been shown to kill cancer cells and stimulate the immune system. There arefew studies done here the mistletoe, but what is under investigation and will later this year. Researchers are studying the safety, effects on the immune system and toxicity.

Acupuncture is particularly useful for post-operative nausea and pain. Many research studies conducted by oncologists have shown that acupuncture was better for women with breast cancer than the medication taken to combat the nausea. It also helps in loss of appetite, fatigue andsleep disorders. The AAMA recommends that women with breast cancer should receive acupuncture during their chemotherapy treatments, but only after speaking with the physician.

All doctors and researchers stress that diet and exercise plays a key role in the treatment of cancer. Maintaining a diet rich in fruits, vegetables and grains. The National Cancer Institute recommends at least 5 servings of fresh fruits and vegetables a day. Phytochemicalsare found in fruits and vegetables prevent cancer in several ways. Research shows that aid in the detoxification of carcinogens, DNA repair, stimulating the immune system and the maintenance of cellular control mechanisms. Obesity has a role in cancer. Change your diet, eat healthy and take a walk or bike. This is a suggestion we all need to hear.

These alternative methods can also help by cancertreatment and maybe even get a faster recovery. New studies are done daily for women with breast cancer. Discuss this alternative therapies with your doctor and always let your doctor and your doctor about any treatments you want to take before posting. This ensures that the alternative therapy will not interfere with chemotherapy and radiation.

Disclaimer: I am not a doctor, or are in the medical field. ThisThe only information that I studied for curiosity and desire to learn all the options available.

Copyright © Mary Hanna, All Rights Reserved.

This article may be distributed freely on your website and in your ezines, as long as this entire article, copyright, links and the resource box are unchanged.

Visit : Fitness Center: Everything For Your Health Mesothelium Information Asbestos Ceiling

Chemotherapy drugs

Chemotherapy is the treatment used to kill or stop the growth of cancer cells. Chemotherapy drugs interfere with the life cycle of tumor cells and prevent their spread. Can be used as a single agent or in combination. Chemotherapy may be used before, after or in addition to surgery, biological therapy, radiotherapy and bone marrow transplantation.

There are several ways to give drugs such as oral medications that are shown inpill and liquid form to SIP and some can be applied directly to the skin such as creams, patches and lotions. Other drugs are administered by injection, which is injected with a syringe and needle into the muscles and body cavities or directly into the tumor area.

The needle gadget, used for drug is usually injected into a vein in your arm or forearm when the session initiation and can be removed at the end of the session. The other gadget is the catheter, which consists of a thin, flexibletube that is inserted into a large vein in the chest, back, arms, abdomen and pelvis.

Catheter types, some wire to the heart and some with different openings. Catheter can be used for long-term chemotherapy for the needle to minimize the number of poles that the patient needs to continue. Is there another way or gadgets used to treat cancer that is the port where the catheter is connected to contain small metal or plastic disc under skin.

Treatment with chemotherapy may be administered to a patient at home, doctor, hospital or clinic. It is given as an outpatient or inpatient. Sometimes the high-dose chemotherapy needs of certain areas known as regional chemotherapy. There are a few examples of how the intra-arterial regional chemotherapy (artery), Intraplural (chest), intravesical (bladder), peritoneal (abdominal) and intrathecal ( CNS).

> Chemotherapy treatment depends on the type, phase, current health of the patient and the amount of the administered dose. You can use a combination of drugs that help to increase their effectiveness. Chemotherapy can cause some side effects such as abandonment, nausea, weight loss, hair loss, memory loss, sore mouth, etc., which may be temporary or permanent.

We can treat these side effects by using other drugs along with chemotherapy and treatment with the drugwithin strict guidelines. Doctors use the calculated amount of chemotherapy drugs for cancer. The doses are measured in milligrams and the appropriate level based on the weight of the patient.

Usually the amount of drug in the course of a season given individual with a formula based on the patient's body surface. This amount is calculated on the patient's weight and height.

See Also : Asbestos Law Information

Cure cancer without chemo - Believe It!

A very effective cure cancer, and is a remedy, is widely used by doctors and peaceful alternative. Why is cheap and just about diet, without expensive drugs are needed, the conventional medical community has no interest, and virtually ignored in the last 55 years. So ridiculously simple that it seems incredible, but treated thousands of cancer patients, including an American president, and brought hope to people who no longer hadno. The diet is based on omega-3 fatty acids and sulfur-rich proteins. It can be built by anyone without the need of a doctor, but this is strongly discouraged and certainly not recommended.

At the time of its discovery in 1950, Dr. Johanna Budwig was the German Central Government Senior Expert on fats and drugs. Dr. Budwig discovered that when unsaturated fats are chemically treated, their unsaturated qualities are destroyed. Dr. Budwig also noted that tumorsoften form in areas of the body normally hosts a number of growth processes, such as skin and digestive tract, and the lack of highly unsaturated fatty stops cells from growing properly, resulting in the formation of tumors.

Dr. Budwig was to discover that some simple dishes would fix it. He found that the combination of ricotta, rich in sulfur protein, and flax seed oil, rich in unsaturated fats, a chemical reaction that produces water-soluble oiland easily absorbed into the cell membranes.

Studies to support the progress
Many studies have been done on this factor, most of them buried out of sight of public opinion. The researchers found that a diet supplemented with flaxseed reduced the growth training, and dissemination of prostate cancer, breast cancer and skin cancer in mice. In a study of rats, flaxseed has been shown that the formation of precancerous colon polyps to reduce, and in astudy of 15 men, it was discovered that a diet low in fat, together with the cells Flaxseed slowed the growth of benign prostate, reducing the risk of developing prostate cancer.

The mortality rate of prostate cancer cells has been shown to dramatically increase the introduction of a diet low in fat, along with ground flaxseed. And in another study in mice with a diet containing linseed oil has been a much slower rate of tumor growth than mice kept at a standarddiet.

Bottom line - the Budwig protocol diet works!
If you are already diagnosed with cancer and want to try the Budwig diet itself, and this seems to defy common sense, you get the oil from flax seeds refrigerated section of your local health food store. Try high lignan flax seed oil to avoid if you do not taste so great. A very good brand Barleen of linseed oil.

Dr. Budwig recommended to mix two tablespoons of cottage cheese witha tablespoon of olive oil, gradually work your way up to full daily protocol of six to eight tablespoons of oil. Anyone with pancreatic cancer should be very careful and work slowly to this amount, but a teaspoon at a time. Also, eat plenty of fresh fruits, vegetables, nuts and whole grains. You can enjoy cocoa, organic shredded coconut and cinnamon too.

Avoid sugar and animal fat like the plague. No, the meat margarine, butter, salad oils and stay away from foodhigh in preservatives. They impede healing. You can use the extra virgin olive oil and balsamic vinegar. And do not eat the leftovers! All food must be prepared! And you must eat immediately on the preparation - that is important, you have the electrons before escaping and the enzymes before they die.

But it will not happen overnight ...
In contrast with powerful prescription drugs, where one usually feel the effects immediately, natural remedies take time and this is notexception. Expect the six months to see a real positive results. Later, when the cancer is resolved, it is important to stay on a maintenance dose of one tablespoon per 100 pounds of body weight per day of oil, in order to avoid a repetition. Further, a good alternative doctor follows up all the time you are in this scheme and any changes you might be tempted to work with your doctor before taking them.

See Also : Nose Reshaping Review Fitness Guide

The most common breast cancer treatment options

With advances in the study, many treatment options for breast cancer to choose from and what you are offered depends on certain factors. Scientists have recently claimed to have discovered a new route to a cure for breast cancer possible. Currently, there are a combination of treatments. The main treatments are surgery, hormone therapy, biological (Herceptin), radiotherapy and chemotherapy. These can be individual orin combination, depending on several factors, including:

the type of breast cancer this
if menopause has occurred or not
tumor size
the degree of tumor cells
The stage of cancer
or certain receptors are present
the general health of the patient

All these factors will be considered by the physician.

cancer stages and grades are given to help physicians assess and classify the tumor andAppropriate to give the same treatment. Stage breast cancer to determine if the cancer has spread and how it grew. The vote means the cancer cells appear when viewed through a microscope. There are three grades, namely low (grade 1 to slow growth), the quality of intermediate (class 2) and a high grade (grade 3), which is a rapidly growing tumor. These have a higher risk of relapse after initial treatment and whether the operation was to excise thecancer, chemotherapy is likely to be administered to destroy lingering cancer cells and therefore the risk of returning. The grades and stages of breast cancer provide a general rule, when it is impossible to generalize about how a tumor will behave.

If the cancer has spread beyond the area of the breast and lymph nodes in my armpit and then localized treatment, but no surgery and a course of chemotherapyradiotherapy in combination with other treatments. However, most people begin their treatment with surgery and there are several types of surgery that could be offered, depending on the location and size of the tumor. Mastectomy breast removal of which is the whole, with a subsequent reconstruction. A lumpectomy is where the tumor is removed with a small amount of surrounding breast tissue. They focus the course of radiotherapy to the chestthat may be offered.

There are many factors to consider when choosing a treatment and is usually how the patient about their options, once a selection of appropriate treatments. There are no right or wrong answers to these decisions and every woman is different. It can be confusing for an entire breast removed, so, if possible, a lumpectomy with radiation therapy is preferable for some women. Some believe that they are not radiation, but others wantwill choose it if it leads to preserve their breast.

There are several types of breast cancer and other cancers in total. Mesothelioma cancer is a very different type of cancer caused by exposure to asbestos. the symptoms of mesothelioma can be generally as chest pain, shortness of breath and persistent cough. The symptoms of breast cancer are more specific things to look for include dimplesskin, change in breast shape or size, thickening or lump in the breast area, especially if the irregular shape, nipple inward as if pulled from within, a rash on nipple or surrounding area, nipple (bloodstained), a lump or swelling in the armpit.

There are many facts of breast cancer, characteristics, symptoms and treatment options for breast cancer aware, but to promote knowledge and research meansThere are many options available for those who suffer from this disease.

Related : Facial Surgery Overview Nose Reshaping Review Fitness Store LOWER Prices in The Same Item

2 Alternative Breast Cancer Treatments and side effects of chemotherapy drugs, reduce!

Chemotherapy refers to the use of drugs to slow or kill cancer cells. It 'a very dangerous treatment has many side effects. The main problem with chemotherapy is that the drugs not only kill cancer cells but healthy cells. This causes damage and often a person does not die because the cancer itself, but because of the damage caused by treatments. The good thing is that there are several alternatives to breast> Treatments for cancer may increase the effect of these drugs kill and cause less damage.

alternative medicine and natural remedies are not considered to be a real help in the fight against cancer by most doctors and "experts." But it is unrealistic to think that there are natural remedies that have no positive effect what so ever. The problem is that large pharmaceutical companies is simply not interested in these cures and remedies, as `tmoney from them. But any way lets get to the point.

alternative treatments for breast cancer - insulin enhancement therapy (IPT)

IPT is very effective, because increasing the effectiveness of chemotherapy drugs. Enhancement of insulin therapy in a small amount of insulin is given to the person, this in turn leads to a state of hypoglycemia. If the person begins to have symptoms that are common with a low blood sugar such as dizziness and weakness,of low doses of conventional chemotherapy to be given to the person. The tumor cells believe that they will get their food, when the insulin, but instead are destroyed by chemotherapy. This means a lower amount of drug required and less damage of these drugs can do.

There are many other drugs that increase the enhanced killing effect of chemotherapy. A strengthening, among other things, is an agent that increases the effectiveness of another agent.In addition hyperthermia insulin therapy and dimethylsulfoxide can also increase the effectiveness of chemotherapy drugs. Vitamin C, vitamin E, glutathione, N-acetylcysteine, coenzyme Q10, beta-carotene, genistein, diadzein, green tea, vitamin A and many others may also increase the effectiveness of chemotherapy drugs. So IPT is a real alternative for the treatment of breast cancer.

alternative treatments for breast cancer -MGN-3

A strong immune system is a very important factor and cancer patients do not have a very strong immune system. In particular, their natural kill (NK) cells are not very active. NK cells are the main cells that fight cancer and other diseases. Dr. Ghoneum, who is an expert in cancer immunotherapy, using biological response modifiers (BRM) to activate NK cells to kill cancer cells. MGN-3 is the most effective and nontoxicBRM.

As this natural killing cells to destroy cancer cells? Well, when an NK cell encounters a cancer cell can be connected to the membrane of tumor cells and injected `s cytoplasmic granules that dissolve quickly the cancer cell. A natural death, single cell can destroy up to 27 tumor cells. The best time to use MGN-3 during or shortly after radiotherapy, surgery or chemotherapy. Because there are fewer cancer cells and therefore moreeffectively MGN-3. But again, this is a very effective treatment option for breast cancer.

Visit : Infant Flu Fitness Store LOWER Prices in The Same Item

Cancer: the shocking truth about the effect of chemotherapy

If you are diagnosed with cancer, it is invariably said to be undergoing surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormone therapy, etc. This seemed the only so-called "proven" trails. Other routes - the alternative and complementary therapies, as the doctors are suspicious, "unfounded" and just hocus pocus. This is also the kind of message is always bombarded with the means of mass communication. All over the world - could be thedeveloped or developing - the same observation has grown and "sold" to the general public. Dr. David Brownstein, in the preface of the book: How to avoid breast cancer, said: "The pharmaceutical companies want us to believe that a cure for cancer is found by a" magic bullet "action of the drug is never. It will be this ".

Reading through numerous books and research articles on the treatment of cancer, I could not help but be disappointed. Many arewritten on a combination of different toxins better than any other combination of a number of other toxins. The data were presented - but massaged for "statistically significant" results that do not mean much in terms of healing, survival and maintenance of quality of life pose. Unfortunately, most of these "educated" people play their games under the same rules to the status quo and safe guard their interests. Their views are as dogmatic and firmly set asconcrete. Differences of opinion and the roads are often not tolerated and even punished by the loss of the right to practice.

Fortunately, despite this, the sky is gray, do not stay all the time. Sometimes, in a corner of this world, there are honest and courageous individuals who stood up, do and say things that others would not dare say or do. Ask your doctor: "what is the contribution of chemotherapy to treat your cancer? What kind of answers you get?

"Oh,you have a 50/50 chance. If you do not go for chemotherapy, you have three months and then you die. "

Or, "If you have chemotherapy you a 90% chance."

Do not be misled and wrong. Ask them what is the significance of the event? The ability to cure cancer or the risk of dying from the treatment? Do not be afraid to ask, even if this occurs the risk that you can get ejected from the office of the doctor (some patients have told me that something has happened to them).It 'better to be chased out of his office and kicked out of this world!

If you are looking for a simple, pre-box the answer, getting the doctor. Unfortunately, "instant noodles" type of responses would lead to disappointment later. In life, I always believe that everything is never easy. You need a hard and serious work to do to learn to do better.

Want to know what is the exact role or contribution of chemotherapy to treat your cancer?

IfTo know the truth, read this article: "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in tumors of adults." The report of this study is exactly what cancer patients are looking for. We've been waiting for an answer - what exactly is the contribution of chemotherapy to overall survival in cancer?

The three authors of the paper are: (1) Graeme Morgan, associate professor and radiation oncologist at Royal North Shore HospitalSydney. (2) Robyn Ward, a senior specialist in Medical Oncology and Associate Professor of Medicine at St Vincent's Hospital in Sydney. She is also a member of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. (3) Michael Barton, associate director of research collaboration results in cancer research and evaluation, Liverpool Health Service, Sydney.

Without doubt, these researchers are professionals of great renown. They know what they say. Their advice is only worth it, if notworth more than what you have consulted doctors for cancer.

Publish their work in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Volume 16, Number 8, December 2004, p. 549-560. It is a respected peer-reviewed medical journal. Their paper was submitted for publication 18 August 2003. E 'was revised and finally accepted for publication June 3, 2004. This means that the paper is examined by doctors and colleagues underwent the normal process of peer review. It is nota back door, such as tug of war in the pages of medical journal. Accordingly, you and me (and even doctors!) There is no doubt that the credibility and validity of what they say in their research paper.

Why publish such a paper?

I can not give the answer, but I can only imagine. In a radio interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), Dr. Morgan was asked this question: "And 'this, I wondered, in a house of battle, the revenge of the? Radio Therapist "Dr. Morgan said:" Well, you can cynically say that, but the reason I did was that we were tired of hearing about these new drugs and was not really the cement around. And the reason why I make that paper was to show that in fact there is no improvement in survival, or improving very, very small, despite all these new drugs and new combinations and bone marrow transplants. "

Albert Einstein said: "The world is a dangerous place,not for those who do evil, but because those who watch and do nothing. "This world is happy, people such as Professor Morgan and his colleagues to speak their minds. We salute them.

Is there something wrong with the paper?

There is nothing wrong with the paper and the evidence presented. Their study was based on data from randomized controlled trials (RCT - the gold standard of medical evidence), published from 01/01/1990 to 01/01/2004. Data were also obtainedof cancer in Australia and the United States. The contribution of chemotherapy to the survival of these more than 20 years and has suffered from 22 major cancers were studied.

If something is wrong at all with this card, it is because it tells the whole truth about chemotherapy. And the truth hurts. The authors do not "sing" the same tune as most of the herd. This is the difference (or wrong!).

What did they say?

The data of real life absoluteThis article, the most shocking: "The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant chemotherapy for 5-year survival in adults was estimated from 2.3% in the U.S. and Australia by 2.1% in it." In short, they said that the contribution of chemotherapy more than 3%.

Can that be true?

Well, they are the experts. And they said so - loud and clear. In fact a number of doctors in Australia were angry. People said that the paper was "misleading and unhelpful."The editors of the Australian doctor (The emperor's new clothes - can survive thermotherapy 2006 29:2-3.?) Cited Professor Michael Boyer, director of Medical Oncology at the Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, saying: " The fact is that from the perspective of a patient that are not really interested in how much chemotherapy contributes to the care of all patients ... I do not think that this document will help the prospect of a patient. "

Medical experts, such assay that they are more patients than patients themselves to understand. So give an authoritative statement of patient accounts. I beg to differ. I think the patients to know yourself. Do you agree that you are not interested in knowing how much your contribution is chemotherapy to treat cancer? To me, this is the answer every patient wants to know before undergoing chemotherapy. Unfortunately, no response ever since. EIf patients too many questions, they will be abused or driven from their doctors offices'.

In the same interview with ABC radio, Professor Michael Boyer was once quoted as saying: "It 's a fact that if you start saying ... ... How to chemotherapy the numbers start creeping up ... When you pull whatever the number is probably 5% or 6%. I think what is important is that it is not as high as 50% or 60%. "This is really puzzling. The figure of 2.3%been challenged. According to Professor de Boer, 5% to 6%.

We need to split hairs? What is so different between 2.3% and 6% - a difference that is big enough or meaningful at all? If you ask any cancer patient what is the difference between a 3% chance of recovery and a 6% chance of recovery, most of them can only say that this is "peanuts". If I tell you the chemotherapy of cancer is only contributing 3% or 6% of their course - I would say that the majority of patientswould just disappear and not tell their oncologists never!

But at a certain "tunnel vision in" statistics and research, 2.3% and 6% is a big difference "statistics" and the difference is significant (the scientific jargon). You can 'massage' the data say that. If you are chemo-X, you get 2%, if you get chemo-Y% 4. You can rotate the picture and say chemo-Y is 100% better than chemo-X. This is how "educated people" massage their datamake it look and sound good.

So what's your opinion?

Want to go for chemotherapy to know that the benefit is only about 3%. Humans differ in our perspective. So, be your own judge.

What about some truth?

It seems a little hoo-hah in Australia, because the relevant work in Australia. But for the rest of the world - the United States, United Kingdom, Europe, etc., no one cares to know or comment. This new truth has no importance or consequence. L 'Indeed, as often happens, as it collides with the device should only be given a quick burial. Nothing is said, even the so-called "independent media".

Visit : Welcome to Cream Care Store.